Florida
Challenges to Amendment 3 Property Tax Proposal Loom as Primary Approaches
The fate of Amendment 3 — a far-reaching property tax cut proposal that could cost cities and counties as $12 billion per year during the next five years — will soon be decided by a circuit court judge in Leon…
Last updated:
Key points
- Amendment 3 could cost local governments in Northwest Florida $12 billion annually over five years.
- Legal challenges question the clarity of the amendment’s ballot summary, with a ruling expected soon.
- Governor DeSantis has criticized the amendment, stating it diverges from his original property tax reform plans.
NewsWK — The future of Amendment 3, a proposed property tax cut initiative that could impact local governments in Escambia and Santa Rosa counties significantly, is now in the hands of a Leon County circuit court judge. This initiative, which could cost cities and counties approximately $12 billion annually over the next five years, is facing legal challenges from former officials and a group known as Save Our Voters from Misleading Ballot Language.
Judge David Frank heard over two hours of arguments regarding the amendment’s ballot summary, which was established by the Florida Legislature. The judge has given litigants until August 3 to submit final arguments before he makes a decision to either dismiss the lawsuits or require a rewrite of the summary. Those opposing the amendment argue it contains misleading political language that could confuse voters about its implications.
Amendment 3 is designed to maintain the existing homestead property exemption for homeowners and aims to increase the exemption limits for long-term property owners to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028. However, it will not affect school taxes and is projected to decrease property tax revenues by an estimated $5 billion in its first year, escalating to nearly $12 billion annually within five years.
Former state Senator Jeff Brandes, who is one of the plaintiffs challenging the amendment, stated, “I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution… this is definitely an issue for the Supreme Court.” The amendment will only take effect if it receives 60% approval from voters in the upcoming November elections.
Economists have warned that the proposed changes could severely limit funding for essential services in local communities, raising concerns among residents about the potential consequences. In contrast, supporters argue that voters will recognize the amendment as a continuation of past homestead tax exemptions.
As the election date approaches, opposition to Amendment 3 appears to be growing. Governor Ron DeSantis has publicly criticized the proposal, asserting that it does not align with his original vision for property tax reform and has indicated he will not support its passage.
This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by our editorial team.
Based on reporting by Christine Sexton originally published by Florida Phoenix. Read the original story.
