Cantonment
Revised Amendment 3 Property Tax Ballot Language Submitted for Judicial Review Ahead of General Election
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has submitted for judicial review a rewritten version of the title and ballot summary for Amendment 3. Circuit Judge David Frank in Leon County ordered the AG’s office to rewrite the far-reaching property tax amendment’s…
Last updated:
Key points
- Florida’s Attorney General submitted revised Amendment 3 ballot language after a judge struck down the original title as political slogan wording.
- The revised amendment would increase homestead exemptions for non-school taxes up to $250,000 by 2028 and lower non-homestead assessment caps to 5%.
- Statewide projections estimate a potential $12 billion annual revenue decrease for local governments by 2031, prompting debate over local service impacts.
NewsWK — Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier’s office has formally submitted a revised title and ballot summary for Amendment 3 to the courts, setting up judicial review for a proposed constitutional measure that could significantly reform property taxation for homeowners and commercial property owners across Escambia and Santa Rosa counties.
The updated submission follows a ruling by Leon County Circuit Judge David Frank, who determined that the original ballot title—’Save our Homes from Excessive Property Taxes’—violated state legal standards by acting as a political slogan rather than an objective summary. Under a 2011 Florida law governing legal challenges to ballot wording, state officials had a 10-day window to draft replacement text before local supervisors of elections finalize general election ballots following the primary elections.
Why it matters here
For residents in Pensacola, Gulf Breeze, Pace, Milton, Cantonment, and surrounding communities, property tax bills have grown alongside rising property assessments and inflation over recent years. If approved by 60% of Florida voters in November, Amendment 3 would deliver substantial statutory relief by raising homestead exemptions on primary residences while reducing assessment growth caps on non-homestead real estate.
At the same time, the broader fiscal impact of the amendment is extensive. Statewide projections indicate the proposed changes could reduce local government property tax revenue by up to $12 billion annually by 2031. Because county commissions, municipal governments, and special fire or utility districts in Northwest Florida rely heavily on ad valorem revenues to fund local operations, voters must weigh direct household tax savings against potential long-term adjustments to public services and local infrastructure funding.
Key Provisions of the Revised Ballot Text
The newly submitted ballot title reads: ‘Increased Homestead exemption; Lower Cap on Increases in Non Homestead Property Assessment.’
The revised summary details several specific changes to Florida’s tax structure:
- Expanded Homestead Exemption: For non-school property taxes, the homestead exemption would increase to $150,000 in 2027 and $250,000 in 2028, with future adjustments tied directly to inflation.
- Lower Assessment Cap: The annual cap on assessment increases for non-homestead properties—such as commercial real estate, second homes, and rental units—would be reduced from 10% to 5%.
- Local Exemption Options: The Florida Legislature would establish a uniform process allowing county commissions and city councils (or special districts via voter referendum) to expand homestead exemptions up to the full assessed value of a primary residence.
- Mandated Revenue Categories: Local governments would be restricted to using property tax revenues exclusively for designated core services, including public safety, education, local infrastructure, natural resources, bond debt service, employee pension obligations, and general administrative operations.
Background and Statewide Debate
The legal challenge to the initial ballot title was led by critics who argued that ballot summary language should remain strictly neutral and descriptive. Former State Senator Jeff Brandes, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the original wording, welcomed the updated draft submitted by the Attorney General’s office.
“Finally, the practicing attorneys took control of the language. The text is honest about what the amendment does,” Brandes stated, encouraging Florida voters to examine the details carefully before making a final decision.
Opposition to the proposed amendment has gathered among municipal associations, law enforcement organizations, and public sector representatives, who argue that substantial reductions in tax collections could restrict funding for essential services or lead local governments to adjust fees and utility rates to make up revenue shortfalls.
Governor Ron DeSantis has expressed support for property tax reductions generally, though his preferred plan included cuts to school property taxes—a provision the Florida Legislature elected not to incorporate into this ballot measure. With court review pending, local election supervisors across Northwest Florida will prepare final ballot proofs ahead of November’s vote.
This article was produced with the assistance of AI and reviewed by our editorial team.
