DeSantis Moves to Designate CAIR Florida as Domestic Terrorist Organization: Implications for Northwest Florida

Last updated: July 2, 2026

TAMPA, Fla. NewsWK — Pensacola residents should take note as Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has announced plans to designate the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) Florida, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Antifa as domestic terrorist organizations under a new law that took effect on July 1, 2026. This decision follows recommendations made to him and is rooted in legislation that grants state officials, including the head of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), the authority to label groups as terrorist organizations if they meet specified criteria.

The new law, known as HB 1471, was passed earlier this year and allows for such designations based on evidence of terrorist activity, a Florida base of operation, and a threat to the security of the state or the nation. Governor DeSantis has indicated that the FDLE has received recommendations to designate over 90 groups, including various cartels and organizations linked to terrorism.

During a press conference in Tampa, DeSantis expressed confidence in the state’s legal standing regarding these designations, stating, “We did need to have more of a legal structure to be able to add teeth to these designations.” The recommendations will be forwarded to the Cabinet for approval, which includes several Republican officials appointed by DeSantis.

This move comes after previous attempts by DeSantis to designate CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood faced legal challenges. In December, a federal judge blocked a similar designation, which the governor’s administration is currently appealing. DeSantis believes that these designations are necessary tools for accountability and public safety.

For local officials and residents in Escambia and Santa Rosa counties, this legislation raises questions about civil liberties and the potential impact on community relations. Local leaders may need to navigate the implications of this law, particularly concerning public funding for institutions that may engage with or support the designated groups.

Critics of the law have voiced concerns that it grants excessive power to state officials and poses risks for civil rights. Former state representative Joel Rudman highlighted the dangers of giving such authority to elected officials, suggesting that it could lead to unintended consequences. Similarly, opponents argue that the law could suppress free speech and target marginalized communities.

As the process moves forward, the community will be watching closely to see how these designations are implemented and what effects they may have on local governance and civil liberties.